The conceptual structure of Basque buru ‘head’i
Resumen
El significado prototípico de la palabra vasca buru es “cabeza”. Al igual que en muchas otras lenguas, la palabra cabeza es polisémica, no sólo porque se refiere a la parte del cuerpo sino también porque puede utilizarse en varios contextos (buru como mente, pronombre reflexivo...). A pesar de que los diccionarios observan estos significados por separado, lo que yo propongo es que todos estos sentidos o acepciones formen parte de una red léxica organizada con tres nodos principales de significados ampliados. Estos tres nodos están estructurados y ligados al buru prototípico por medio de tres metonimias diferentes: el todo por la parte, categoría o valor de posición y la parte por el todo. Estas tres metonimias forman la base conceptual del resto de extensiones semánticas de buru, que se obtienen con la ayuda de otros recursos cognitivos como metáforas y polisemias de composición.
Estadísticas
Referencias
ALLAN, Keith. 1995. 'The antropocentricity of the English word(s) back'. Cognitive Linguistics 6-1: 11-31. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1995.6.1.11
AUSTIN, J.L. 1961. Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
BARCELONA, Antonio. 1997. 'Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within Cognitive Linguistics'. Atlantis XIX.1: 21-48.
BARCELONA, Antonio., (ed.). 2000a. Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
BARCELONA, Antonio., 2000b. 'On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor'. In: Antonio Barcelona (ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. A Cognitive Perspective 31-58.Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894677.31
BARCELONA, Antonio., 2000c. 'Introduction. The cognitive theory of metaphor and metonymy'. In: Antonio Barcelona (ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. A Cognitive Perspective 1-28. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894677.1
BRETONES-CALLEJAS, Carmen; María Cristobal; and Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano. In press. The construction SALIR-DE in Spanish. How Spanish speakers conceptualise exiting events. In: Mirjam Fried and Hans Boas (eds.), Construction Grammar Back to the Roots. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
BRUGMAN, Claudia. 1981. The story of Over. MA Thesis. University of California at Berkeley.
BRUGMAN, Claudia. 1983. 'The use of body-part terms as locatives in Chalcatongo Mixtec'. In: A. Schlichter et al. (eds.), Survey of Californian and other Indian Languages. Report # 4: 235-290.
CHAPELL, Hilary and WILLIAM, McGregor (eds.). 1994. The Grammar of Inalienability: A Typological Perpective on Body Part Terms and the Part-whole Relation. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
CLARK, Herbert. 1973. 'Space, time, semantics and the child'. In: T.E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language 28-63. New York: Academic Press.
CUYCKENS, Hubert. 1991. The Semantics of Spatial Prepositions in Dutch: A Cognitive Linguistic exercise. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Antwerp. Euskaltzaindia. 1991. Euskal Gramatika. Lehen Urratsa-I. Bilbao: Euskaltzaindia.
GIBBS, Ray Jr. 1994. The Poetics of the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
GOATLY, Andrew. 1997. The Language of Metaphors. London and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203210000
GOLDBERG, Adele. 1995. Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
GOLDENBERG, Gideon. 1991. '"Oneself", "one's own" and "one another" in Amharic'. In: Alan S. Kaye (ed.), Semitic Studies 531-549. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
GOOSSENS, Louis. 1990. 'Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action'. Cognitive Linguistics 1:323-340. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.323
HALLIDAY, M.A.K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London, Baltimore, Melbourne: Edward Arnold.
HEINE, Bernd. 1989. 'Adpositions in African languages'. Linguistique Africaine 2: 77-127.'
HEINE, Bernd., 2000. On the evolution of grammatical forms: the case of reflexive marking. Paper presented at the Berkeley Linguistics Colloquia, April 10, 2000.
HERSKOVISTS, Annette. 1986. Language and Spatial Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Study of the Prepositions in English. Boston, Basel: Birkhäuser.
IBARRETXE-ANTUÑANO, Iraide. 1999. Polysemy and Metaphor in Perception Verbs: A Cross-linguistic Study. PhD Thesis. University of Edinburgh.
IBARRETXE-ANTUÑANO, Iraide., 2001. "An overview of Basque Locational cases: Old descriptions, new approaches". International Computer Science Institute Technical Report No 01-006. (Available at http://www. icsi.berkeley.edu/techreports/index).
IBARRETXE-ANTUÑANO, Iraide., In prep. Is the Container Schema a Conceptual Primitive Schema? Evidence from Basque and Spanish. Department of Linguistics. University of California at Berkeley.
IBARRETXE-ANTUÑANO, Iraide and Ludovica SERRATRICE. 1999. Making sense of 'over'. A Study in Acquisition. Paper presented at the 6th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference. Stockholm, Sweden.
JOHNSON, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Reason, Thought, and Imagination. Chicago: Chicago University Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001
JOHNSON, Mark. , 1992. 'Philosophical implications of cognitive semantics'. Cognitive Linguistics 3.4: 345-366. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1992.3.4.345
KÖVECSES, Zoltán and Günter Radden. 1998 'Metonymy: Develping a cognitive linguistic approach'. Cognitive Linguistics 9.1:37-77. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37
LAKOFF, George. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
LAKOFF, George, 1993. 'The contemporary theory of metaphor' In: Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought 202-251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
LAKOFF, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
LAKOFF, George and Mark Johnson, 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh. The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to the Western World. New York: Basic Books.
LAKOFF, George and Mark Turner. 1989. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: Chicago University Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
LANGACKER, Ronald W. 1991. Concept, Image, and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
LANGACKER, Ronald W., 2000. 'A dynamic usage-based model'. In: Michael Barlow and Susanne Kemmer (eds.), Usage-based Models of Language, 1-65. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
LHANDE, Pierre. 1926. Dictionnaire basque-français. Paris: Gabriel Beauchesne.
LINDNER, Susan. 1981. A Lexico-semantic Analysis of English Ver-particle Constructions with UP and OUT. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. University of California, San Diego.
MEYER, Bernard. 1993. Synecdoques: Etude d'une figure de rhétorique. Volume 1. Paris: L'Harmattan.
NERLICH, Brigitte. In press. 'Synecdoche: A trope, a whole trope and nothing but a trope? In: Neal R. Norrick and Armin Burkhart (eds.), Tropical Truth.
NERLICH, Brigitte and David D. Clarke. 1999. 'Synecdoche as a cognitive and communicative strategy'. In: Andreas Blank and Peter Koch (eds.) Historical Semantics and Cognition, 195-212. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110804195.197
PANTHER, Klaus-Uwe and Günter RADDEN (eds.). 1999. Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4
PAPAFRAGOU, Ann. 'On metonymy'. Lingua 99.4: 169-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(96)00016-2
PASCUAL-ARANSÁEZ, Cristina. 1998-99. 'The role of the head in the conceptualisation of rational behaviour: A cross-linguistic study of the metaphorical expressions of the folk model of the head'. RESLA, Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 13: 113-124.
RADDEN, Günter. 2000. 'How metonymic are metaphors?'. In: Antonio Barcelona (ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. A Cognitive Perspective, 93-108. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894677.93
RADDEN, Günter and Zoltán KÖVECSES. 1996. Towards a theory of metonymy. Hamburg: Cognitive Linguistics: Explorations, Applications, Research (C.L.EA.R.)
RICE, Sally. 1996. 'Prepositional prototypes'. In: Martin Pütz and René Dirven (eds.), The Construal of Space in Language and Thought, 135-165. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110821611.135
REBUSCHI, Georges. 1993. 'Basque pronouns and relativized locality'. In: José Ignacio Hualde and Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds.), Generative Studies in Basque Linguistics, 115-144. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.105.05reb
REBUSCHI, Georges, 1995. 'Weak and strong genitive pronouns in Northern Basque: A diachronic perspective'. In: José Ignacio Hualde, Joseba A. Lakarra and R.L. Trask (eds) Towards a History of the Basque Language, 313-356. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.131.13reb
ROSCH, Eleanor. 1977. 'Human categorisation'. In: Norman Warren (ed.), Studies in Crosscultural Psychology, vol. 1, 1-49. London: Academic Press.
ROSCH, Eleanor., 1978. 'Principles of human categorisation'. In: Eleanor Rosch and B.B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and Categorisation, 27-48. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
RUIZ DE MENDOZA IBÁNEZ, Francisco José. 1999. Introducción a la Teoría Cognitiva de la Metonimia. Granada: Granada Lingvistica.
SANDRA, Dominiek and Sally Rice. 1995. 'Network analyses of prepositional meaning: Mirroring whose mind- the linguist's or the language user's?'. Cognitive Linguistics 6-1: 89-130. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1995.6.1.89
SETO, Ken-Ichi. 1999. 'Distinguishing metonymy from synecdoche'. In: Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Thought and Language, 91-120. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.06set
SINHA, Chris and Tania KUTEVA. 1995. 'Distributed spatial semantics'. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 18: 167-199. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586500000159
SPERBER, Dan and Deidre Wilson. 1995. Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Oxford, Eng. and Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwells.
SWEETSER, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904
SWEETSER, Eve. In press. ''The suburbs of your good pleasure': Co-orientation of metaphorical mappings in literary and everyday language'. Zeitschrift für Semiotik.
SVOROU, Soteria. 1993. The Grammar of Space. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
VILLASANTE, Luis. 1978 [1983]. Estudios de Sintaxis Vasca. Oñate: Ed. Franciscana Aranzazu.
Derechos de autor 2002 Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.
