Atención pública a la ciencia 1820-2010: un panorama longue durée

Martin W. Bauer

doi:10.35462/pv.285.2

Martin W. Bauer [Suiza]

Resumen

Publicamos la traducción de este artículo del profesor Martin W. Bauer, que formó parte del libro The Sciences’ Media Connection –Public Communication and its Repercussions, editado por Simone Rödder, Martina Franzen y Peter Weingart en 2012*. En la parte III de dicha publicación, dedicada a la cobertura mediática de la ciencia, se incluye este estudio que analiza un periodo de dos siglos dotándolo de un índice que refleja el nivel de atención pública a la ciencia. Esta perspectiva a largo plazo, con metodologías sistemáticas para el análisis, es una aportación esencial para este monográfico, por lo que se procede a su reedición traducida. [PV].

Estadísticas

114

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Referencias

ADITC. (1991). Australian Science and Innovation impact brief, section 5: science and technology news in the media, 35-43.

Bauer, M. W. (1995). The opening and closing of the window of science, 1820-1990, trabajo presentado para Chinese Association for Science and Technology, Public Understanding of Science Conference, 15-19 October 1995, Beijing.

Bauer, M. (1998a). «La longue durée» of popular science, 1830-present. En D. Deveze-

Berthet (ed.), La promotion de la culture scientifique et technique: ses acteur et leurs logic, Actes du colloque des 12 et 13 decembre 1996 (pp. 75-92). L'Universite Paris Diderot.

Bauer, M. W.(1998b). The medicalisation of science news: from the «rocket-scalpel» to the «gene-meteorite» complex. Social Science Information, 37, 731-751.

Bauer, M. W. (2005). The mass media and the biotechnology controversy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(1), 5-22 [n.º especial].

Bauer, M. W. (2005). Distinguishing GREEN from RED biotechnology - cultivation effects of the elite press. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(1), 63-89 [n.º especial].

Bauer, M. W. (2007). The public career of «genes». Trends in public sentiment from 1946 to 2002. New Genetics and Society, 26(1), 29-45.

Bauer, M. W., Durant, J., Ragnarsdottir, A. & Rudolfsdottir, A. (1995). Science and technology in the British Press, 1946-1990, Vol 1-4. Informe para Wellcome Trust for the History of Medicine, julio, Londres. The Science Museum.

Bauer, M. W & Jensen, P. (2011). The mobilisation of scientists for public engagement, Public Understanding of Science, 20(1), 3-11.

Bauer, M. W., Petkova, K., Boyadjieva, P. & Gornev, G. (2006). Long-term trends in the representations of science across the iron curtain: Britain and Bulgaria, 1946-95. Social Studies of Science, 36(1), 97-129.

Beguet, B. (ed.). (1990). La science pour tous: sur la vulgarisation scientifique en France de 1850 a 1914. Bibliothèque de CNAM.

Braudel, F. (1958). La longue durée. Annales. E. S. C., 13(4), 725-753 (reimpr. Ecrits sur l'Histoire, pp. 41-83, 1969, Paris, Flammarion).

Broks, P. (1988). Science and the popular press: a cultural analysis of British family magazines, 1890 to 1914 (doctorado). Lancaster University.

Broks, P. (1996). Media science before the Great War. MacMillan Press.

Bucchi, M. & Mazzolini, R. G. (2007). Big science, little news. Science coverage in the Italian daily press, 1946-1997. En M. W. Bauer & M Bucchi (eds.), Journalism, Science and Society. Science communication between news and public relations (pp. 53-70). Routledge.

Burnham, J. (1987). How superstition won and science lost: popularizing science and health in the United States. Rutgers University Press.

Carsons, R. (1962/2000). Silent Spring. Penguin Classics.

Caudill, E. (1987). A content analysis of press views of Darwin's evolution theory 1860-1925. Journalism Quarterly, 4, 782-786.

Cooter, R. (1984). The cultural meaning of popular science, Phrenology and the organisation of consent in 19th century Britain. Cambridge University.

Cooter, R. & Pumphrey, S. (1994). Science in popular culture. Science Popularisation, History of Science, 32(3), 237-267.

Cotkin, G. (1984). The socialist popularization of science in America, 1901 to the First World War. History of Education Quarterly, 24, 101-214

Dicke, R. H. (1975). Are there inherent limits to the natural sciences? Journal of the Franklin Institute, 300, 93-98.

Ehrhardt, G. R. (1993). Descendents of Prometheus: popular science writing in the US, 1915-1948 (tesis doctoral). Duke University.

Ellegard, A. (1990). Darwin and the general reader. Chicago University Press.

Farr, R. M. (1993). Common sense, science and social representations. Public Understanding of Science, 2, 189-204.

Fischer, D. H. (1996). The great wave: price revolutions and the rhythm of history. Oxford University.

Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact. CUP (original alemán en 1935).

Franklin, J. (2007). The end of science journalism. En M. W. Bauer & M Bucchi (eds.), Journalism, Science and Society. Science communication between news and public relations (pp. 143-156). Routledge.

Gingras, Y. (1994). Pour l'avancement des science, Histoire de l'ACFAS 1923-1993. Boreal.

Goepfert, W. (2008). The strength of PR and the weakness of science journalism. En M. W. Bauer & M. Bucchi (eds.), Journalism, Science and Society. Science communication between news and public relations (pp. 215-226). Routledge.

Goldacre, B. (2009). Bad Science. Harper Perennial.

Gregory, J. (2005). Fred Hoyle's Universe. OUP.

Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the Public sphere. An inquiry into a category of Bourgeois Society, MIT Press (original en alemán, 1962).

Hayes, R. (1994). From Faust to Strangelove. Representations of scientists in Western Literature. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Hinton, D. A. (1979). Popular science in England, 1830-1870 (tesis doctoral inédita). University of Bath.

Holland, S. & Jones, S. (1994). The ATHENAEUM scientific database (manuscrito). Department of Information Science, City University.

House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology. (2000). Science and Society, 3rd Report. HMSO.

Jacques, J. & Raichvarg, D. (1991). Savants et ignorants: une histoire de la vulgarisation des science. Seuil.

Jones, G., Connell, I. & Meadows, A. J. (1978). The presentations of science in the media. PCRC, University of Leicester.

Jovchelovitch, S. (2006). Knowledge in context: representations, community and culture. Routledge.

Jurdant, B. (1969). Vulgarisation scientifique et ideologie. Communication, 14, 150-161.

Jurdant, B. (1993). Popularisation as the autobiography of science. Public Understanding of Science, 2, 365-374.

Kepplinger, M. (1989). Kuenstliche Horizonte, Folgen, Darstellung und Akzeptanz von Technik in der Bundesrepublik. Campus.

Kirby, D. (2009). Diegetic prototypes and the role of popular films in generating real-world technological developments. Social Studies of Science, 1-30.

Kittering, G. S. (1981). Studies in the popularisation of science in England 1800-1830 (tesis doctoral no publicada). University of Kent.

Knight, D. (2006). Public Understanding of Science: a history of communicating scientific ideas. Routledge.

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology. SAGE.

Kuritz, H. (1981.) The popularization of Science in 19th century America. History of Education Quarterly, 21, 259-274.

LaFollette, M. C. (1977). Authority, promise, expectations: the image of science and scientists in American popular magazines, 1910-1955 (tesis doctoral). Indiana.

LaFollette, M. C. (1991). Making science our own. Public images of science, 1910-1955. University of Chicago Press.

Lancashire, J. A. (1988). An historical study of the popularisation of science in general science periodicals in Britain, c. 1890-c. 1939 (tesis doctoral). University of Kent at Canterbury.

Lewenstein, B. (1992). The meaning of «public understanding of science» in the US after World War II. Public Understanding of Science, 1, 45-68.

Lewenstein, B. (1995). Science in the media. En S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen & T. Pinch (eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (pp. 343-360). SAGE.

Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinión. HBC. (Nueva edición 2004, Dover publications).

MacLeod, R. (1994). Science for imperial efficiency and social change: reflections on the British Science Guild, 1905-1936. Public Understanding of Science, 3(2), 155-194.

MacLeod, R. & Collins, P. (eds.). (1981) The parliament of science. The BA for the Advancement of Science, 1831-1981. Science Reviews. Maddison, A. (1991). Dynamic forces in capitalist development. A long-run comparative view. OUP.

Maddison, A. (1995). Monitoring the world economy, 1820-1992. OECD.

McCombs, M. (2004). Setting the agenda, The mass media and public opinión. Polity Press.

Mortureux, M. F. (1978). La formation et le fonctionnement d'un discours de la vulgarisation scientifique au XVIIIeme siècle a travers l'oeuvre de Fontenelle (tesis). Paris VIII (copia).

Moss, H. (1983). Scientists and sans-culotte: the spread of scientific literacy in the revolutionary year II. Fundamentia scientiae, 4, 101-115.

Neidhardt, F. (1993). The public as a communication system. Public Understanding of Science, 2, 339-350.

Nelkin, D. (1995). Selling Science: how the press covers science and technology. WH Freeman.

Niderst, A. (ed.). (1991). La diffusion des sciences au XVIIIe siecle. Revue d'histoire des sciences, 44(3/4), 279-280.

Niva, F. & Kobayashi, S. (1994). A study of science and technology information dissemination by Japan's mass media (artículo presentado en Conference «Education for Science Literacy», 6-9 November 1994, Londres). Science Museum.

Pellechia, M. G. (1997). Trends in science coverage: a content analysis of three US newspapers.

Public Understanding of Science, 6, 49-68.

Pew. (2011). Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism: year in the news (http://features.journalism.org/year-in-the-news; acceso, 25/02/2011).

Price, D. J. de S. (1963). Little Science, Big Science. Columbia University Press.

Raichwarg, D. (1990). 400 années de diffusion de la science par le spectacle, formes, objectifs, moyens (tesis doctoral). Paris VII.

Ring, K. (1988). The popularisation of elementary science through popular science books, 1870-1939 (tesis doctoral). University of Canterbury.

Royal Society of London. (1985). Public Understanding of Science. RS.

Ruhrmann, G. (1991). Analyse von Technik- und Risiko-Berichterstattung. Defizite und Forschungsperspectiven. Kommentar zu Kepplinger. En J. Kruger & S. Russ-Mohl (eds.), Risikokommunikation (pp. 145-174). Edition Sigma.

Schäfer, M (2011). Taking Stock: a meta-analysis of studies on the media's coverage of science. Public Understanding of Science, 21(6), 650-663.

Shapin, S. (1974). The audience for science in eighteenth century Edinburgh. History of Science, 12(2), 95-121

Sheets-Pyenson, S. (1985). Popular science periodicals in Paris and London: the emergence of low scientific culture 1820-1875. Annals of Science, 42, 549-572.

Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Belknap Press.

Tichenor, P. J., Olien, C. N., Harrison, A. & Donohue, G. (1970). Mass communication systems and communication accuracy in science reporting. Journalism Quarterly, 47, 673-83.

Trebilcock, C. (2002). Surfing the wave: the long cycle in the industrial centuries. En P. Martland (ed.), The future of the past. Big questions in history (pp. 66-88). Pimlico.

Turner, F. (1980). Public science in Britain, 1880-1919. Isis, 21, 589-608.

Turner, F. (1988). The Victorian conflict between science and religion: a professional dimensión. En G. Parsons (ed.), Religion in Victorian Britain, vol. IV. Interpretations (pp. 170-197). MUP.

Turney, J. (2008). The latest boom in popular science books. En M. W. Bauer & M. Bucchi (eds.), Journalism, Science and Society. Science Communication between news and Public Relations (pp. 81-92). Routledge.

Van Duijn, J. J. (1983). The long wave in economic life. George Allen & Unwin.

Wagner, S. (1985). Die Entwicklung der exakten Naturwissenschaften von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart. Eine Quantifizierung ihrer Geschichte (Science Studies Report, 27). Kleine.

Waldenfels, B. (2004). Phenomenologie der Aufmerksamkeit. Suhrkamp.

Wardhaugh, B. (2009). Mathematics in English printed books, 1473-1800: a bibliometric analysis. Notes & Records of the Royal Society, 63, 325-338.

Weart, S. (1988). Nuclear fear. A history of images. Harvard University Press.

Weingart, P. (1991). The loss of distance: science in transition. En G. E. Allen & R. M. MacLeod (eds.), Science, history and social activism: a tribute to Everett Mendelsohn (pp. 167-184). Kluver Academic Publishers.

Werskey, G. (1988). The visible college. A collective biography of British scientists and socialists of the 1930s. Free Association Books.

Whalen, M. D. & Tobin, M. F. (1980). Periodicals and the popularization of science in America, 1860-1910. Journal of American Culture, 3, 195-205.