Pertsona murriztapenak ditu egitura inpertsonalak: euskararen kasua [Las construcciones impersonales tienen restricciones de persona: el caso del euskera]
Resumen
En este artículo exploramos las restricciones de persona que presentan las impersonales en euskera: la condición de persona del argumento externo y la restricción de persona del argumento interno. Proponemos que el argumento externo de la impersonal es un pronombre vacío pro, un SD interpretado como [+humano]. Este argumento se sitúa en el especificador del núcleo Voz. Además, defendemos que el núcleo Voz de las impersonales es defectivo, lo que explica que las relaciones de caso y concordancia sean más restrictivas que en las transitivas. En consecuencia, tanto el argumento externo como el interno deben concordar con el núcleo T(iempo), dando lugar a la restricción de persona del segundo.
Estadísticas
Referencias
Adger, D. & Harbour, D. (2007). Syntax and syncretism of the Person Case Constraint. Syntax, 10, 2-37.
Agirre, K. (2018). Amek ez dute. Erein.
Aissen, J. (2003). Differential object marking: iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21, 435-483. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024109008573
Albizu, P. (1997a). The syntax of person agreement. Eskuizkribua. University of Southern California.
Albizu, P. (1997b). Generalized person-case constraint: a case for a syntax-driven inflectional morphology. ASJU, 40, 1-33.
Albizu, P. (1997c). En torno a la inacusatividad sintáctica de las construcciones impersonales del euskera. Interlingü.stica, 8, 13-18.
Albizu, P. (2001). Datibo sintagmaren izaera sintaktikoaren inguruan: eztabaidarako oinarrizko zenbait datu. In B. Fernández & P. Albizu (arg.), Kasu eta komunztaduraren gainean. On case and agreement (49.-69. or.). UPV/EHU.
Aldridge, E. (2004). Ergativity and word order in Austronesian languages [Argitaratu gabeko doktore tesia]. Cornell University.
D’Alessandro, R. (2004). Impersonal constructions [Doktore tesia, University Stuttgart]. OPUS. https://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/5252
Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E. & Schäfer, F. (2006). The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. In M. Frascarelli (arg.), Phases of interpretation (187.-211. or.). Mouton.
Alexiadou, A. & Schäfer, F. (2006). Instrument subjects are agents or causers. In D. Baumer, D. Montero & M. Scanlon (arg.), Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (40.-48. or.). Cascadilla.
Anagnostopoulou, E. (2003). The syntax of ditransitives. Evidence from clitics. Mouton de Gruyter.
Béjar, S. & Rezac, M. (2003). Person licensing and the derivation of PCC effects. In A. T. Pérez-Leroux & Y. Roberge (arg.), Romance linguistics: Theory and acquisition (49.-62. or.). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.244.07bej
Berro, A., Oihartzabal, B. & Fernández, B. (2018). Inkoatibo/arazle alternantzia euskaraz eratortzen. Fontes Linguae Vasconum, 126, 99-122. https://doi.org/10.35462/FLV126.4
Berro, A. & Fernández, B. (2019). (Euskal) bozak: erdikoak, inkoatiboak eta arazleak. In I. Laka (arg.), Hitzak sarean. Pello Salabururi esker onez (39.-50. or.). UPV/EHU.
Berro, A., Odria, A. & Fernández, B. (2022). Person matters in impersonality. Syntax, 25(1), 1-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12230
Bhatt, R. & Pancheva, R. (2005). Implicit arguments. In M. Everaert & H. Van Riemsdijk (arg.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, 3. lib. (558.-588. or.). Blackwell Publishing.
Bossong, G. (1991). Differential Object Marking in Romance and beyond. In D. Wanner & D. A. Kibbee (arg.), New analyses in Romance linguistics (43.-171. or.). John Benjamins.
Brettschneider, G. (1979). Typological characteristics of Basque. In F. Plank (arg.), Ergativity. Toward a theory of grammatical relations (371.-384. or.). Academic Press.
Chierchia, G. (2004). A Semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. In A. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopoulou & F. Schäfer (arg.), The unaccusativit puzzle. Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface (22.-59. or.). Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: its nature, origin and use. Praeger.
Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (arg.), Step by step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (89.-155. or.). The MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (arg.), Ken Hale: A life in language (1.-52. or.). The MIT Press.
Coon, J. (2010). Complementation in Chol (Mayan): A theory of split ergativity [Doktore tesia, MIT]. Dspace@MIT. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/62409
Duguine, M. (2010). Argumentu isilak eta hizkuntz aldakortasuna. UEU.
Duguine, M. (2013). Null arguments and linguistic variation. A minimalist analysis of pro-drop [Argitaratu gabeko doktore tesia]. UPV/EHU & Université de Nantes.
Euskaltzaindia. (1987). Euskal gramatika. Lehen urratsak II (EGLU II). Euskaltzaindia.
Euskara Institutua. (2011). Goenkale Corpusa. UPV/EHU. https://www.ehu.eus/ehg/goenkale/
Fernández, B. & Berro, A. (2021). Basque impersonals in comparison. Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-005
Fernández, B. & Ortiz de Urbina, J. (2010). Datiboa hiztegian. UPV/EHU.
Fernández, B. & Rezac, M. (2010). Datibo osagarri bitxiak eta Datiboaren Lekualdatzea: ari nai diyot eta kanta egin nazu bidegurutzean. ASJU, 52, 113-149.
Fernández, B. & Rezac, M. (2016). Differential Object Marking in Basque varieties. In B. Fernández & J. Ortiz de Urbina (arg.), Microparameters in the grammar of Basque (93.-139. or.). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.13.05fer
Hualde, J. I. (1988). Case assignment in Basque. ASJU, 22(1), 313-330.
Kalin, L. (2018). Licensing and Differential Object Marking: The view from Neo-Aramaic. Syntax, 21(2), 112-159. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12153
Kramer, R. (2014). Clitic doubling or object agreement: The view from Amharic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 32, 593-634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9233-0
Kratzer, A. (1994). The event argument and the semantics of voice. Eskuizkribua. University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Kratzer, A. (1996). Severing the external argument from its verb. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (arg.), Phrase structure and the lexicon (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 33. lib.) (109.-137. or.). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Laka, I. (1993). The structure of Inflection: a case study in Xº syntax. In J. I. Hualde & J. Ortiz de Urbina (arg.), Generative studies in Basque linguistics (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 105) (21.-70. or.). John Benjamins.
Landau, I. (2010). The explicit syntax of implicit arguments. Linguistic Inquiry, 41(3), 357-388. https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00001
Legate, J. (2002). Walrpiri: Theoretical implications [Doktore tesia, MIT]. Dspace@ MIT. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/8152
Legate, J. (2008). Morphological and abstract case. Linguistic Inquiry, 39(1), 55-101. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2008.39.1.55
Levin, T. (2019). On the nature of differential object marking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 37(1), 167.-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-018-9412-5
Levin, B. & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1995). Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge (MA), the MIT Press.
Massam, D. (2002). Fully internal case: Surface ergativity can be profound. In A. Rackowski & N. Richards (arg.), Proceedings of AFLA 8: The Eighth Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 44) (185.-196. or.). MIT.
Mendikoetxea, A. (2008). Clitic impersonal constructions in Romance: Syntactic features and semantic interpretation. Transactions of the Philological Society, 106(2), 290-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2008.00210.x
Mounole, C. (2012). The evolution of transitive verbs in Basque and the emergence of dative-marked patients. In G. Authier & K. Haude (arg.), Ergativity, valency, and voice (335.-379. or.). Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110227734.355
Odria, A. (2014). Differential object marking and the nature of dative case in Basque varieties. Linguistic Variation, 14(2), 289-317. https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.14.2.03odr
Odria, A. (2017). Differential object marking in Basque syntax [Doktore tesia, UPV/EHU]. ADDI. https://addi.ehu.es/handle/10810/29766
Odria, A. (2019). DOM and datives in Basque: not as homogeneous as they might seem. Linguisticae Investigationes, 42(1), 8-31. https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00027.odr
Ormazabal, J. & Romero, J. (2007). The Object Agreement Constraint. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, 315-347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9010-9
Ormazabal, J. & Romero, J. (2019). The formal properties of non-paradigmatic se. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 8, 55-84. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.8.1.4704
Ortiz de Urbina, J. (1988). Interferentzia sintaktiko berezi batez. In II. Euskal Mundu-Biltzarra, Euskara Biltzarra. I. atala: Hizkuntz deskribapena. Eusko Jaurlaritza.
Ortiz de Urbina, J. (2003). Impersonal clauses. In J. I. Hualde & J. Ortiz de Urbina (arg.), A grammar of Basque (572.-591. or.). Mouton de Gruyter.
Ortiz de Urbina, J. (2006). Old Basque (medio)passives. ASJU, 40, 763-786.
Ortiz de Urbina, J. (2011-2019). Aditz inpertsonalak. In P. Salaburu, I. Sarasola & P. Goenaga (arg.), Sareko Euskal Gramatika (SEG). http://www.ehu.eus/seg/morf/5/12/2/2#predikatu_inpertsonalak/
Ortiz de Urbina, J. & Fernández B. (2016). Datives in Basque bivalent unergatives. In B. Fernández & J. Ortiz de Urbina (arg.), Microparameters in the grammar of Basque (67.-93. or.). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.13.04ort
Preminger, O. (2014). Agreement and its failures. The MIT Press.
Rezac, M. (2007). Escaping the Person Case Constraint: referential computation in the phi system. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 6, 97-138. https://doi.org/10.1075/livy.6.06rez
Rezac, M. (2008). Phi-Agree and theta-related Case. In D. Harbour, D. Adger & S. Béjar (arg.), Phi-teory: phi-features across interfaces and modules (83.-130. or.). Oxford University Press.
Rezac, M. (2009a). Person restrictions in Basque intransitives. Lapurdum, 13, 305-322.
Rezac, M. (2009b). On the unifiability of repairs of the Person Case Constraint: French, Basque, Georgian, and Chinook. ASJU, 43(1/2), 769.-790.
Rezac, M. (2011). Phi-features and the modular architecture of language. Springer.
Rezac, M. (2016). Gaps and stopgaps in Basque verb finite agreement. In B. Fernández & J. Ortiz de Urbina (arg.), Microparameters in the grammar of Basque (139.-192. or.). John Benjamins.
Rezac, M., Albizu, P. & Etxepare R. (2014). The structural ergative of Basque and the theory of Case. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 32(4), 1273-1330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9239-7
Richards, M. (2008). Defective Agree, case alternations, and the prominence of person. Linguistische Arbeits Berichte, 86, 137-162.
Rijk, R. P. G. de. (2008). Standard Basque. A progressive grammar. MIT.
Rodet, A. (1992). Construccions amb lectura arbitrària en basc. ASJU, 26, 145-179.
Sarasola, I., Salaburu, P. & Landa, J. (2001-2007). Ereduzko Prosa Gaur (EPG). UPV/EHU, Euskara Institutua. http://www.ehu.eus/euskara-orria/euskara/ereduzkoa/
Sarasola, I., Salaburu, P. & Landa, J. (2021). Egungo testuen Corpusa (ETC). UPV/EHU, Euskara Institutua. https://www.ehu.eus/etc/
Taraldsen, K. T. (1995). On agreement and nominative objects in Icelandic. In H. Haider, S. Olsen & S. Vikner (arg.), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax (207.-237. or.). Kluwer.
Urdangarin, M. (2002). Oihana. Heldu artean. Gaztelupeko ahotsak. https://www.badok.eus/euskal-musika/mikel-urdangarin/heldu-artean/
Urrestarazu, I. (2019). Nire barruko Setatsua: (euskal) boza eta erdiko egiturak [Argitaratu gabeko Gradu Amaierako Lana]. UPV/EHU.
Woolford, E. (2006). Lexical case, inherent case, and argument structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 37(1), 111-130. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438906775321175
Derechos de autor 2022 Ane Odria, Ane Berro, Beatriz Fernández
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.
