Pertsona murriztapenak ditu egitura inpertsonalak: euskararen kasua [Impersonals have person restrictions: the case of Basque]
Abstract
In this paper we explore the person restrictions that the impersonal construction presents: the person condition of the external argument and the person restriction on the internal argument. We propose that the external argument of the impersonal is a silent pronoun of DP category (pro) that must be interpreted as [+human]. This argument is located at the specifier of Voice. Additionally, we also argue that Voice is defective in impersonals and that this explains the restricted case and agreement relations of the construction. Since Voice is defective, both the external and the internal arguments must Agree with T(ense), which causes the person restriction on the internal argument.
##about.statistics##
References
Adger, D. & Harbour, D. (2007). Syntax and syncretism of the Person Case Constraint. Syntax, 10, 2-37.
Agirre, K. (2018). Amek ez dute. Erein.
Aissen, J. (2003). Differential object marking: iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21, 435-483. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024109008573
Albizu, P. (1997a). The syntax of person agreement. Eskuizkribua. University of Southern California.
Albizu, P. (1997b). Generalized person-case constraint: a case for a syntax-driven inflectional morphology. ASJU, 40, 1-33.
Albizu, P. (1997c). En torno a la inacusatividad sintáctica de las construcciones impersonales del euskera. Interlingü.stica, 8, 13-18.
Albizu, P. (2001). Datibo sintagmaren izaera sintaktikoaren inguruan: eztabaidarako oinarrizko zenbait datu. In B. Fernández & P. Albizu (arg.), Kasu eta komunztaduraren gainean. On case and agreement (49.-69. or.). UPV/EHU.
Aldridge, E. (2004). Ergativity and word order in Austronesian languages [Argitaratu gabeko doktore tesia]. Cornell University.
D’Alessandro, R. (2004). Impersonal constructions [Doktore tesia, University Stuttgart]. OPUS. https://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/5252
Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E. & Schäfer, F. (2006). The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. In M. Frascarelli (arg.), Phases of interpretation (187.-211. or.). Mouton.
Alexiadou, A. & Schäfer, F. (2006). Instrument subjects are agents or causers. In D. Baumer, D. Montero & M. Scanlon (arg.), Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (40.-48. or.). Cascadilla.
Anagnostopoulou, E. (2003). The syntax of ditransitives. Evidence from clitics. Mouton de Gruyter.
Béjar, S. & Rezac, M. (2003). Person licensing and the derivation of PCC effects. In A. T. Pérez-Leroux & Y. Roberge (arg.), Romance linguistics: Theory and acquisition (49.-62. or.). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.244.07bej
Berro, A., Oihartzabal, B. & Fernández, B. (2018). Inkoatibo/arazle alternantzia euskaraz eratortzen. Fontes Linguae Vasconum, 126, 99-122. https://doi.org/10.35462/FLV126.4
Berro, A. & Fernández, B. (2019). (Euskal) bozak: erdikoak, inkoatiboak eta arazleak. In I. Laka (arg.), Hitzak sarean. Pello Salabururi esker onez (39.-50. or.). UPV/EHU.
Berro, A., Odria, A. & Fernández, B. (2022). Person matters in impersonality. Syntax, 25(1), 1-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12230
Bhatt, R. & Pancheva, R. (2005). Implicit arguments. In M. Everaert & H. Van Riemsdijk (arg.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, 3. lib. (558.-588. or.). Blackwell Publishing.
Bossong, G. (1991). Differential Object Marking in Romance and beyond. In D. Wanner & D. A. Kibbee (arg.), New analyses in Romance linguistics (43.-171. or.). John Benjamins.
Brettschneider, G. (1979). Typological characteristics of Basque. In F. Plank (arg.), Ergativity. Toward a theory of grammatical relations (371.-384. or.). Academic Press.
Chierchia, G. (2004). A Semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. In A. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopoulou & F. Schäfer (arg.), The unaccusativit puzzle. Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface (22.-59. or.). Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: its nature, origin and use. Praeger.
Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (arg.), Step by step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (89.-155. or.). The MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (arg.), Ken Hale: A life in language (1.-52. or.). The MIT Press.
Coon, J. (2010). Complementation in Chol (Mayan): A theory of split ergativity [Doktore tesia, MIT]. Dspace@MIT. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/62409
Duguine, M. (2010). Argumentu isilak eta hizkuntz aldakortasuna. UEU.
Duguine, M. (2013). Null arguments and linguistic variation. A minimalist analysis of pro-drop [Argitaratu gabeko doktore tesia]. UPV/EHU & Université de Nantes.
Euskaltzaindia. (1987). Euskal gramatika. Lehen urratsak II (EGLU II). Euskaltzaindia.
Euskara Institutua. (2011). Goenkale Corpusa. UPV/EHU. https://www.ehu.eus/ehg/goenkale/
Fernández, B. & Berro, A. (2021). Basque impersonals in comparison. Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-005
Fernández, B. & Ortiz de Urbina, J. (2010). Datiboa hiztegian. UPV/EHU.
Fernández, B. & Rezac, M. (2010). Datibo osagarri bitxiak eta Datiboaren Lekualdatzea: ari nai diyot eta kanta egin nazu bidegurutzean. ASJU, 52, 113-149.
Fernández, B. & Rezac, M. (2016). Differential Object Marking in Basque varieties. In B. Fernández & J. Ortiz de Urbina (arg.), Microparameters in the grammar of Basque (93.-139. or.). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.13.05fer
Hualde, J. I. (1988). Case assignment in Basque. ASJU, 22(1), 313-330.
Kalin, L. (2018). Licensing and Differential Object Marking: The view from Neo-Aramaic. Syntax, 21(2), 112-159. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12153
Kramer, R. (2014). Clitic doubling or object agreement: The view from Amharic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 32, 593-634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9233-0
Kratzer, A. (1994). The event argument and the semantics of voice. Eskuizkribua. University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Kratzer, A. (1996). Severing the external argument from its verb. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (arg.), Phrase structure and the lexicon (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 33. lib.) (109.-137. or.). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Laka, I. (1993). The structure of Inflection: a case study in Xº syntax. In J. I. Hualde & J. Ortiz de Urbina (arg.), Generative studies in Basque linguistics (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 105) (21.-70. or.). John Benjamins.
Landau, I. (2010). The explicit syntax of implicit arguments. Linguistic Inquiry, 41(3), 357-388. https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00001
Legate, J. (2002). Walrpiri: Theoretical implications [Doktore tesia, MIT]. Dspace@ MIT. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/8152
Legate, J. (2008). Morphological and abstract case. Linguistic Inquiry, 39(1), 55-101. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2008.39.1.55
Levin, T. (2019). On the nature of differential object marking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 37(1), 167.-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-018-9412-5
Levin, B. & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1995). Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge (MA), the MIT Press.
Massam, D. (2002). Fully internal case: Surface ergativity can be profound. In A. Rackowski & N. Richards (arg.), Proceedings of AFLA 8: The Eighth Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 44) (185.-196. or.). MIT.
Mendikoetxea, A. (2008). Clitic impersonal constructions in Romance: Syntactic features and semantic interpretation. Transactions of the Philological Society, 106(2), 290-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2008.00210.x
Mounole, C. (2012). The evolution of transitive verbs in Basque and the emergence of dative-marked patients. In G. Authier & K. Haude (arg.), Ergativity, valency, and voice (335.-379. or.). Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110227734.355
Odria, A. (2014). Differential object marking and the nature of dative case in Basque varieties. Linguistic Variation, 14(2), 289-317. https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.14.2.03odr
Odria, A. (2017). Differential object marking in Basque syntax [Doktore tesia, UPV/EHU]. ADDI. https://addi.ehu.es/handle/10810/29766
Odria, A. (2019). DOM and datives in Basque: not as homogeneous as they might seem. Linguisticae Investigationes, 42(1), 8-31. https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00027.odr
Ormazabal, J. & Romero, J. (2007). The Object Agreement Constraint. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, 315-347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9010-9
Ormazabal, J. & Romero, J. (2019). The formal properties of non-paradigmatic se. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 8, 55-84. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.8.1.4704
Ortiz de Urbina, J. (1988). Interferentzia sintaktiko berezi batez. In II. Euskal Mundu-Biltzarra, Euskara Biltzarra. I. atala: Hizkuntz deskribapena. Eusko Jaurlaritza.
Ortiz de Urbina, J. (2003). Impersonal clauses. In J. I. Hualde & J. Ortiz de Urbina (arg.), A grammar of Basque (572.-591. or.). Mouton de Gruyter.
Ortiz de Urbina, J. (2006). Old Basque (medio)passives. ASJU, 40, 763-786.
Ortiz de Urbina, J. (2011-2019). Aditz inpertsonalak. In P. Salaburu, I. Sarasola & P. Goenaga (arg.), Sareko Euskal Gramatika (SEG). http://www.ehu.eus/seg/morf/5/12/2/2#predikatu_inpertsonalak/
Ortiz de Urbina, J. & Fernández B. (2016). Datives in Basque bivalent unergatives. In B. Fernández & J. Ortiz de Urbina (arg.), Microparameters in the grammar of Basque (67.-93. or.). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.13.04ort
Preminger, O. (2014). Agreement and its failures. The MIT Press.
Rezac, M. (2007). Escaping the Person Case Constraint: referential computation in the phi system. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 6, 97-138. https://doi.org/10.1075/livy.6.06rez
Rezac, M. (2008). Phi-Agree and theta-related Case. In D. Harbour, D. Adger & S. Béjar (arg.), Phi-teory: phi-features across interfaces and modules (83.-130. or.). Oxford University Press.
Rezac, M. (2009a). Person restrictions in Basque intransitives. Lapurdum, 13, 305-322.
Rezac, M. (2009b). On the unifiability of repairs of the Person Case Constraint: French, Basque, Georgian, and Chinook. ASJU, 43(1/2), 769.-790.
Rezac, M. (2011). Phi-features and the modular architecture of language. Springer.
Rezac, M. (2016). Gaps and stopgaps in Basque verb finite agreement. In B. Fernández & J. Ortiz de Urbina (arg.), Microparameters in the grammar of Basque (139.-192. or.). John Benjamins.
Rezac, M., Albizu, P. & Etxepare R. (2014). The structural ergative of Basque and the theory of Case. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 32(4), 1273-1330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9239-7
Richards, M. (2008). Defective Agree, case alternations, and the prominence of person. Linguistische Arbeits Berichte, 86, 137-162.
Rijk, R. P. G. de. (2008). Standard Basque. A progressive grammar. MIT.
Rodet, A. (1992). Construccions amb lectura arbitrària en basc. ASJU, 26, 145-179.
Sarasola, I., Salaburu, P. & Landa, J. (2001-2007). Ereduzko Prosa Gaur (EPG). UPV/EHU, Euskara Institutua. http://www.ehu.eus/euskara-orria/euskara/ereduzkoa/
Sarasola, I., Salaburu, P. & Landa, J. (2021). Egungo testuen Corpusa (ETC). UPV/EHU, Euskara Institutua. https://www.ehu.eus/etc/
Taraldsen, K. T. (1995). On agreement and nominative objects in Icelandic. In H. Haider, S. Olsen & S. Vikner (arg.), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax (207.-237. or.). Kluwer.
Urdangarin, M. (2002). Oihana. Heldu artean. Gaztelupeko ahotsak. https://www.badok.eus/euskal-musika/mikel-urdangarin/heldu-artean/
Urrestarazu, I. (2019). Nire barruko Setatsua: (euskal) boza eta erdiko egiturak [Argitaratu gabeko Gradu Amaierako Lana]. UPV/EHU.
Woolford, E. (2006). Lexical case, inherent case, and argument structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 37(1), 111-130. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438906775321175
Copyright (c) 2022 Ane Odria, Ane Berro, Beatriz Fernández
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
